I want an SKS Rifle Stocks that is not a norinco and one that will shoot when I want it to I just dumped my shitty norinco off for 200.00 What should I look for and what should I be expecting to spend ? User Info IM User Email User Reply Quote Report dwinecof Bronze …Read the Rest
aimpoint magnifier – AR-15 Stock
User Info Joined: Nov 2000 OH, Offline Posts: 7912 Link To This Post EE Feedback 100% (3) Posted: 10/9/2011 9:56:59 AM EST I have at least a few thond rounds through several different SKS Rifle Stocks rifles and have never experienced a slam fire. Just realize that the possibility exists and maintain proper muzzle discipline …Read the Rest
Nikon Buckmasters Rifle Scopes –
seamasterpro 2/2/2011 11:56:18 PM I tossed the two around before I bought and ended up with the LT-681 on my A4gery and glad I did. because of the short eye relief of the TA31 I mounted mine really far back, farther than I could have gone with the LT-100. the LT-681 mounts extremely solid so …Read the Rest
For the LE or Military professional Pro Ears are not only vital at the range but also in tactical situations where having the ability to increase hearing protection up to 8 times normal can mean the difference between life and death. For the hunter or naturalist wearing Pro Ears enables you to be aware of …Read the Rest
What in your respected opinions are the pro’s and cons of each design.. Price, reliability, ergos.. As a left hander any insight into which of the two has better handling for a lefty would be very appreciated. There was an FAL vs M14 Accessoriestopic awhile back under the fn forum but I wanted a more unbiased opinion. thanks guys.. Spade
1/19/2006 11:14:47 AM M14 Accessorieswas made here. That’s essentially why it won. m4hk33
1/19/2006 12:19:25 PM its allways politics from what i gather, they were fairly equil but test were established to let the M14 Accessoriesfair better. im sure that SA had some influence on this process, there was also intrest that was produced domestically, as to not depend on another country for weapons. they both are good, to me the FAL feels like a real rifle where as the M14 Accessoriesfeels like a hunting rifle. but many feel the opposite, in choosing a new weapon, justt ask you self what you want out of it, its really hard to offer advice not knowing in what way they are going to be used out of all the 308s availible i like the ar10 better than both, its more accurate and reliable than i could ever ask for, and for me, its been better than both my FAL and M14 AccessoriesTimJ 1/19/2006 12:21:28 PM The M-14 was a gov.org arsenal design, the FAL was NMH (Not Made Here). There were a few reliability issues with the FAL, which may or may not have been the result of Army Ordinance playing with the weapon and keeping FN people away from the tests (recall that both were weapons in development at the time). Overall the FAL is a better military weapon, although the M-14 is a fine rifle. Also, the argument was made that the M-14 could be manufactured on Garand tooling, a substantial savings. Having shot both the M-14 and the (civilian) FAL quite a bit, I like the FAL more. With a better trigger and sights there would be no contest, IMO. The FAL came this close to winning. triburst1
1/19/2006 12:51:58 PM The M14/M1A is a nice gun and a good platform for a DM rifle, but the FAL is a better battle rifle, IMO. raf [Site Staff] 1/19/2006 1:58:59 PM If you are a lefty, the M1A is friendlier than the FAL, as its’ charging handle is on the correct side for you. bishopm14
1/19/2006 2:28:09 PM Ahh, it’s that time of the month again,right on schedule, FAL vs. M14. First, for a lefty, the ’14 is far superior to the FAL. Probably unintentionally, the M14 Accessorieswas the most ambidextrous rifle the US ever adopted. Without a doubt, the FAL being NIH (Not Invented Here) had a good bit to do with the M14 Accessoriesbeing adopted. But the ’14 also fit in better with the long standing tradition and myth in the military of the American rifleman. In a direct comparison, the M14 Accessoriesis a fine rifleman’s rifle, while the FAL is a rifle that can be used/maintained by illiterate third world peasants in various third world shitholes, that also just happens to launch 7.62 slugs.Not to say either can’t do what the other does, but the empahsis and priorities of the designs are not hard to notice. When it comes down to it, whether for civvie or military use, it’s six of one and a half dozen of the other. I’ve got both, and will take the M14 Accessoriestype everytime, but wouldn’t feel any real disadvantage with a FAL.Not fighting fair and being a mean little shit will make up for any difference. Spade
1/19/2006 4:33:21 PM Originally Posted By triburst1: The M14/M1A is a nice gun and a good platform for a DM rifle, but the FAL is a better battle rifle, IMO. Oh, plus one on that. p-dog
1/19/2006 8:00:40 PM M14′s have better sights & better trigger pulls. The M14′s magazine is more robust. The M14 Accessoriesis more reliable with debris in the system. The FAL is more controllable with its pistol grip stock, easier to scope, and quicker to reload. Still I vote M14. rjroberts 1/19/2006 8:01:33 PM The usual answer: whatever feels best to you. Seriously. It has to feel right to sit right, and it has to sit right to shoot well. I do not like the FAL. It just feels odd to me, worse, actually. However, that said, looking at it and its design, it is a TOP rifle, and probably a better SHTF rifle than most others. I have had an M1A, and they have their own idiosyncrosies. The M1 felt better to me, but I don’t like all the rods flying around as they do, and the idea that stress on the stock affects the accuracy and repeatability so. Sure, stress will affect any rifle, but improvement by putting grease on the spot where the gas assembly plate contacts the stock forarm – come on!